Showing posts with label best value electric cars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best value electric cars. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Advantages and disadvantages of lithium-ion batteries for energy storage?

best value electric cars
 on ... Electric & Hybrid Cars with Best MPG; Clean Diesels & High-MPG Car and
best value electric cars image



Bill23


Anyone know what the advantages/disadvantages are for lithium-ion batteries other than their costs? I heard they are probably the best option for electric cars, why is that? Why aren't they viable for off-grid storage? Just the costs?

Thanks!!
Also need information on flow batteries. Other than low-energy density and the inability to scale-up what are the disadvantages of flow batteries? Advantages?



Answer
"Just the costs" ???? Obviously, you have never learned about the time value of money. Try researching Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value. The costs are a big deal. Lithium Ion may be the best battery technology that we have but there are many problems. They are tricky and dangerous to charge and discharge. Their capacity degrades almost immediately, they degrade the fastest when completely charged or completely discharged hence they are stored at 50% for shipping. Their volumetric energy may be the best for batteries but is still very low. They can only discharge at certain rates. Charging batteries is a little like warming up a frozen steak to room temperature, at first the changes occur quickly but as you approach your target, the rate slows down even though you may be putting the same amount of energy into it.

Ultimately, a battery is just a way of chemically storing energy. Well, so are gasoline and diesel, indeed these are stored solar energy. Unlike batteries, gasoline and diesel are energy dense, and do not self drain over time ( though gasoline will separate into varnishes ). We also know how to efficiently synthesize hydrocarbons from a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen gases in exothermic Fischer Tropsch reactions and have done so on national scales. WWII Germany fueled their planes and Embargoed South Africa fueled their trucks this way. The US currently dilutes it's high sulfur diesel with synthetic diesel to meet federal ultra low sulfur diesel requirements, yes this doubled the price of diesel overnight when the legislation passed in the 90's. Canada's tarsands are gasified into syngas and the synthesized into a synthetic crude. We can get the syngas from gasification of coal, natural gas, tarsands, biomass such as trash and dried sewage or even directly from CO2 and H2O if we use an energy source. We basically know how to "charge" CO2 and H2O back into gasoline and diesel and we can and have done so efficiently. It's just that storing energy ourselves doesn't compete with the energy that nature has stored for us. However, it does mean we can do better than lithium-ion batteries just by synthesizing our fuel and using existing vehicles and fuel delivery infrastructure. EV's with lithium-ion batteries are just green washing to sell new cars.

Synthetic fuels from the gasification of biomass can also produce charcoal which when used as biochar sequesters carbon from the environment. Our existing gasoline vehicles can remove CO2 from the atmosphere with carbon negative synthetic fuels. An electric car can not do that.

Would you spend more for an electric car, and how much more?




greg w


If there was a nearly perfect electric car, with all the comforts you're used to, unlimited range through fast charging (comparable to gas filling), acceleration as good or better as your current car, the whole works.

Would you pay 5% more for the car, or would you buy a car where the savings in fuel has a 5 year payoff?

What's your money stance on this issue, given perfectly equal performance.



Answer
To calculate what would be the % premium to pay for an electric car over a gas car, I'd take 1 - [PV([total cost of ownership of electric car over 5 years]-[est. residual value at the end of the 5 years])]/[PV([total cost of ownership of gas car over 5 years]-[est. residual value at the end of the 5 years])]. This would be assuming you pay for the car in cash up front.

A 5 year payoff is way too long since people don't keep cars for very long anymore. Also, it would be hard to convince a lot of people to opt for that considering the emotional reaction to the sticker price and factoring in opportunity cost and the time-value of money.

The problem right now is that there is such a wide gap in performance/convenience for an electric car vs. a gas car, and its hard to justify even paying the same price, much less a premium.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

How do you measure the mpg on an electric motor?

best value electric cars
 on Used and New Car Companies Category - Apollofind.com
best value electric cars image



pete


Recently there have been announcements by GM's Chevy dept that It's volt receives some 230 mpg and the Nissan also announced that it's Leaf gets 367 mpg. My question is how does one calculate the mpg rating on an electric car... I thought I'd search online to find a conversion from mile per charge to mpg, but haven't found anything...anyone got an answer?


Answer
GM and then Nissan used the EPA's draft method for calculating an mpg rating from an electric car.

It's a difficult situation, because people are used to seeing a car's efficiency in mpg, but obviously that's not applicable to a car when it's not using gasoline. So what the EPA is doing is figuring out a conversion to translate the amount of energy used by electric cars into an equivalent mpg rating. But they haven't finalized the conversion yet. All they have at this point is a draft, and GM took the draft method, calculated a value for the Volt, and made a big deal about it. Which is kind of lame. Then Nissan one-upped them by using the same calculation for their LEAF.

Why can't they just put a self-charging system on a electric car?

Q. They have alternators on cars now...Why can't they figure out a way to install a charging system on a wheel or something like that to keep the batteries charged on a electric car to get more mileage out of them between charges?


Answer
There are a few tricks, such as regenerative braking, solar panels, or wind alternators that can squeeze out an extra ounce of energy that would have been wasted otherwise. Car companies have been using them in their vehicles to build value, and give bragging rights, but most EV builders do not use them, as they are rarely cost effective.

Electric cars will gain greater range in the future as these tricks (but especially battery technology) improve. Despite what news reporters say, there is no miracle technology around the corner.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Advantages and disadvantages of lithium-ion batteries for energy storage?

best value electric cars
 on ... boosts price of new CTS by $6,000; Cars, trucks with best resale value
best value electric cars image



Bill23


Anyone know what the advantages/disadvantages are for lithium-ion batteries other than their costs? I heard they are probably the best option for electric cars, why is that? Why aren't they viable for off-grid storage? Just the costs?

Thanks!!
Also need information on flow batteries. Other than low-energy density and the inability to scale-up what are the disadvantages of flow batteries? Advantages?



Answer
"Just the costs" ???? Obviously, you have never learned about the time value of money. Try researching Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value. The costs are a big deal. Lithium Ion may be the best battery technology that we have but there are many problems. They are tricky and dangerous to charge and discharge. Their capacity degrades almost immediately, they degrade the fastest when completely charged or completely discharged hence they are stored at 50% for shipping. Their volumetric energy may be the best for batteries but is still very low. They can only discharge at certain rates. Charging batteries is a little like warming up a frozen steak to room temperature, at first the changes occur quickly but as you approach your target, the rate slows down even though you may be putting the same amount of energy into it.

Ultimately, a battery is just a way of chemically storing energy. Well, so are gasoline and diesel, indeed these are stored solar energy. Unlike batteries, gasoline and diesel are energy dense, and do not self drain over time ( though gasoline will separate into varnishes ). We also know how to efficiently synthesize hydrocarbons from a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen gases in exothermic Fischer Tropsch reactions and have done so on national scales. WWII Germany fueled their planes and Embargoed South Africa fueled their trucks this way. The US currently dilutes it's high sulfur diesel with synthetic diesel to meet federal ultra low sulfur diesel requirements, yes this doubled the price of diesel overnight when the legislation passed in the 90's. Canada's tarsands are gasified into syngas and the synthesized into a synthetic crude. We can get the syngas from gasification of coal, natural gas, tarsands, biomass such as trash and dried sewage or even directly from CO2 and H2O if we use an energy source. We basically know how to "charge" CO2 and H2O back into gasoline and diesel and we can and have done so efficiently. It's just that storing energy ourselves doesn't compete with the energy that nature has stored for us. However, it does mean we can do better than lithium-ion batteries just by synthesizing our fuel and using existing vehicles and fuel delivery infrastructure. EV's with lithium-ion batteries are just green washing to sell new cars.

Synthetic fuels from the gasification of biomass can also produce charcoal which when used as biochar sequesters carbon from the environment. Our existing gasoline vehicles can remove CO2 from the atmosphere with carbon negative synthetic fuels. An electric car can not do that.

Would you spend more for an electric car, and how much more?




greg w


If there was a nearly perfect electric car, with all the comforts you're used to, unlimited range through fast charging (comparable to gas filling), acceleration as good or better as your current car, the whole works.

Would you pay 5% more for the car, or would you buy a car where the savings in fuel has a 5 year payoff?

What's your money stance on this issue, given perfectly equal performance.



Answer
To calculate what would be the % premium to pay for an electric car over a gas car, I'd take 1 - [PV([total cost of ownership of electric car over 5 years]-[est. residual value at the end of the 5 years])]/[PV([total cost of ownership of gas car over 5 years]-[est. residual value at the end of the 5 years])]. This would be assuming you pay for the car in cash up front.

A 5 year payoff is way too long since people don't keep cars for very long anymore. Also, it would be hard to convince a lot of people to opt for that considering the emotional reaction to the sticker price and factoring in opportunity cost and the time-value of money.

The problem right now is that there is such a wide gap in performance/convenience for an electric car vs. a gas car, and its hard to justify even paying the same price, much less a premium.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Friday, November 29, 2013

Why can't they just put a self-charging system on a electric car?

best value electric cars
 on BYD shares plummet, spotlight falls on Buffett | CarNewsChina.com ...
best value electric cars image
Q. They have alternators on cars now...Why can't they figure out a way to install a charging system on a wheel or something like that to keep the batteries charged on a electric car to get more mileage out of them between charges?


Answer
There are a few tricks, such as regenerative braking, solar panels, or wind alternators that can squeeze out an extra ounce of energy that would have been wasted otherwise. Car companies have been using them in their vehicles to build value, and give bragging rights, but most EV builders do not use them, as they are rarely cost effective.

Electric cars will gain greater range in the future as these tricks (but especially battery technology) improve. Despite what news reporters say, there is no miracle technology around the corner.

If we all have Electric cars, how do we get the power to run them?

Q. I understand the need to reduce the use of fossil fuels in vehicles. However if we are to have alternate fuels and electric cars how do we produce enough energy to commute? Coal produces more emmissions as a percentage of world emmisions, Nuclear power produces waste you have to secure store and watch over for hundreds of thousands of years, solar doesn't give us enough power, and Bio Feuls are not economically efficient enough to support the amount of vehicles. Where do we get the energy from? Are the days of the affordable personal vehicle drawing to a close?


Answer
And so the dilemma gos...Power is not free.

Part of the benefit of electric cars or non polluting vehicles is the degree of control over emissions. Let me explain:

Consider that there is (for example) 1 million cars in a particular urban area. 40 years ago that number released pollutant gases, gasoline and crankcase fumes...lets measure the value at "1" for each car, meaning 1,000,000 units of pollution were released . The same number of cars today releases perhaps 1/2 of that. What if that could be eliminated and the pollution is XERO from these one million sources? As you not the tradeoff is that more electric plants are needed and they pollute also.

BUT, the difference is that the pollution from a single source is much easier to choose, monitor and control than 1 million sources. It could be augmented by solar and wind, which are unrliable, but available...and hydro and nuclearare still a viable sources.
I am more tolerant of the waste problem of nuclear, since we have not fully utilize our waste disposal options in salt domes and desert places. In a way, we have collected and concentrated radioactive sources, and burying it is just returning it to nature where we got it

Even coal, natural gas plants give us a single point of pollution which we can focus our efforts on. Now that we have substancially reduced flue ash, surfur dioxide and Nitrous Oxide (acid rains) the problem seems to be CO2, It is much easier to forcus resources to reduce this in afew places than try to do it on 1 million cars.

Summary: It is the right direction...




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

How much HP motor should I use for 2000 kg car to make electric car?

best value electric cars
 on 1891 first electric tattoo machine in his encyclical de rerum novarum ...
best value electric cars image



iamback


I want to make a electric car. The car weight's 2000 kg. I want to know that how much HP motor should i use for it.


Answer
Well, you would need to know the air resistance at various speeds and the rolling resistance, particularly at your intended cruising speed. Then you need to add power to that value to give you the amount of acceleration that you want to still have at that speed based upon the F=MA formula.

You'll probably want to check out some of Robert Q Riley's books. He's been promoting DIY microcars for some time now. His latest, the XR3 hybrid looks pretty cool.

Would you trade your car for an electric one?




rambling v


If someone offered to exchange your car for an electric car of comparable value, would you make the trade?
(I beg your pardon, afratta437. Before asking questions in the future, I should consult with the republican cyberbully.)



Answer
Yes, I would make the trade! There is technology available NOW to make an electric car run up to 300+ miles on one charge. Why is it that an oil company owns the company that makes the batteries? Afraid of the competition?

We are talking about breaking our dependency on foreign oil, yet every year fuel milage on new vehicles BS. How is it that back in the late 70s, early 80s fuel efficiency increased by leaps and bounds, but now, it jumps by 2 mpg, and auto makers expect a technological award.

Auto makers and oil companies CRUSHED the first electric car since the beginning of the LAST century. There were electric cars and trucks in large numbers running on 19th century technology, yet here we are in the 21st century dealing with global warming, high butt gas prices, SMOG, etc, but we can't make a totally electric vehicle to satisfy US consumers? I don't think so!!!

The hydrogen car is not a future dream, it's a nightmare. Nothing about it is economical. If you think the electric car is bad, the hydrogen car is multiple times worse.

There is a company in Australia and one in France working on a car that runs off compressed air. If you haven't heard of either of them, here is a link to help you out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmqpGZv0YT4

As much as it costs these days to own and operate a vehicle, anything other than gas powered will cost more to purchase, but in the long run will cost less to operate.

It's sad, I guess the US will have to wait for a foreign auto maker to come in and put that last nail in the coffin before they create a vehicle that the people want. Oh, people DO want an electric car, air car.....anything that will run on something other than gas, but won't do as much harm to the environment. Not that many people want Hummers, but GM produced them. I wil bet my dollar to anyone's penny that more people would be interested in a vehicle that runs off of the means mentioned than the number of Hummers H1 sold. US automakers are getting beat as though they stole something by Toyota. When will they wake up? I guess with 'oil men' in the white house, it will have to be under another president to encourage and FUND research for alternative fuels.....other than hydrogen.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers